REVIEW PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of driving speed and liquid pressure on the average coverage rate and unevenness coefficient using selected standard and air induction flat fan nozzles. The study was conducted using a spraying device that functioned like a self-propelled sprayer. Based on the test results, it was found that the highest average coverage was obtained for single standard flat fan nozzles. On the other hand, greater uniformity was observed with standard nozzles at 0.4 MPa.
REFERENCES (11)
1.
Bolat, A.; Özlüoymak, Ö. Evaluation of performances of different types of spray nozzles in site-specific pesticide spraying. Semin. Ciências Agrárias. 2020, 41, 1199–1212.
 
2.
Cieniawska, B.; Pentoś, K.; Szulc, T. Correlation and Regression Analysis of Spraying Process Quality Indicators. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12 (23). https://doi.org/10.3390/app122....
 
3.
Cieniawska, B.; Pentos, K. Average Degree of Coverage and Coverage Unevenness Coefficient as Parameters for Spraying Quality Assessment. Agric. 2021, 11 (2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/agricu....
 
4.
Dereń, K.; Szewczyk, A.; Sekutowski, T.R. The effect of the type of preparation with the content of nano-copper and copper on the coverage of winter rape plants. J. Agric. Eng. 2018, 63, 51–55.
 
5.
Drocas, I.; Marian, O.; Ranta, O.; Molnar, A.; Muntean, M.; Cătunescu, G. Study on determining the degree of cov-erage when performing phytosanitary treatments using water sensitive paper. Lucr. Ştiinţifice Agron. 2014, 57, 159–163.
 
6.
Ferguson, J. C.; Chechetto, R. G.; Hewitt, A. J.; Chauhan, B. S.; Adkins, S. W.; Kruger, G. R.; O’Donnell, C. C. As-sessing the Deposition and Canopy Penetration of Nozzles with Different Spray Qualities in an Oat (Avena Sativa L.) Canopy. Crop Prot. 2016, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crop....
 
7.
Kluza, P. A.; Kuna-Broniowska, I.; Parafiniuk, S. Modeling and Prediction of the Uniformity of Spray Liquid Cover-age from Flat Fan Spray Nozzles. Sustain. 2019, 11 (23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su1123....
 
8.
Nan, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, J.; Yang, K.; Ge, Y. Low-Volume Precision Spray for Plant Pest Control Using Profile Variable Rate Spraying and Ultrasonic Detection. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2....
 
9.
Qin, W.C.; Xue, X.Y.; Cui, L.F.; Zhou, Q.; Xu, Z.F.; Chang, F.L. Optimization and test for spraying parameters of cotton defoliant sprayer. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2016, 9, 63–72.
 
10.
Ranta, O.; Marian, O.; Muntean, M. V.; Molnar, A.; Ghețe, A. B.; Crișan, V.; Stănilă, S.; Rittner, T. Quality Analysis of Some Spray Parameters When Performing Treatments in Vineyards in Order to Reduce Environment Pollution. Sustain. 2021, 13 (14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su1314....
 
11.
Tadić, V.; Radočaj, D.; Jurišić, M. Machine Learning Methods for Evaluation of Technical Factors of Spraying in Permanent Plantations. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1977. https://doi.org/10.3390/agrono....
 
eISSN:2719-423X
ISSN:1642-686X
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top